<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Killer Presentations &#187; Persuasion</title> <atom:link href="http://www.killerpresentations.com/tag/persuasion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.killerpresentations.com</link> <description>Killer Presentations by Nicholas Oulton founder of m62 visualcommunications and PowerPoint Presentation expert</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 04:03:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1</generator> <item><title>Prove It! Make Your Sales Arguments More Compelling &amp; Believable</title><link>http://www.killerpresentations.com/sales-effectiveness/prove-it-make-your-sales-arguments-more-compelling-believable/</link> <comments>http://www.killerpresentations.com/sales-effectiveness/prove-it-make-your-sales-arguments-more-compelling-believable/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:51:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator><![CDATA[nick]]></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Sales Effectiveness]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Effective Presentation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Persuasion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Proof]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerpresentations.com/?p=1052</guid> <description><![CDATA[<div><img
width="150" height="150" src="http://www.killerpresentations.com/kp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/chicken-or-the-egg-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="chicken-or-the-egg" /></div>&#8220;I believe we can help you&#8221; isn’t a good sales line. My belief that I can help you isn&#8217;t persuasive; you would expect me to believe that whatever I&#8217;m selling works (I hope). If the most common sales mistake is not articulating the reasons to buy, next is assuming that because you have identified ways to drive value for your &#8230; <a
href="http://www.killerpresentations.com/sales-effectiveness/prove-it-make-your-sales-arguments-more-compelling-believable/">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img
width="150" height="150" src="http://www.killerpresentations.com/kp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/chicken-or-the-egg-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="chicken-or-the-egg" /></div><p>&#8220;I believe we can help you&#8221; isn’t a good sales line.</p><p>My belief that I can help you isn&#8217;t persuasive; you would expect me to believe that whatever I&#8217;m selling works (I hope). If the most common sales mistake is not articulating the reasons to buy, next is assuming that because you have identified ways to drive value for your client, so have they.</p><p>Prove it!<span
id="more-1052"></span></p><h3>Step 1</h3><p>The search for Proof is more likely to be successful if you know what you are looking for. Often marketing teams search in vain for relevant case studies because they don’t know what they are trying to prove. The client likes us isn&#8217;t a good qualification criteria. Lewis Caroll wrote, &#8220;if you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there.&#8221; So, start with a specific proof point. For my business, I have to prove that clients improve their sales win rates when they work with my team. If I ask my marketing department to provide me with statistics on that proof, it’s a much easier directive than “please create some compelling case studies.”</p><h3>Step 2</h3><p>Look in these four areas:</p><ol><li>Testimonials: 1st person (using your own data and personal experience), 2nd Person (profile the success of a client with similar issues as the prospect), 3rd Person (a credible, independent verification of value, not capability) 3rd person testimonials from a trusted source are the most persuasive, but quoting Private Eye in the UK or National Enquirer in the US don’t qualify, and 2nd person is probably better than 1st. On the whole, testimonials are only as powerful as the source and only if they are relevant!</li><li>Processes: list the steps involved in driving value and compare your process to the competitors (or their lack of process.)</li><li>Technology: whether it’s online systems, hardware, a methodology or Intellectual Property &#8211; just try and avoid making it about people. Any sales person with a modicum of passion about their company can wax poetic about how much smarter, faster and more talented their people are than the competition.</li><li>Logical arguments: if in doubt, create a deductive chain starting from a known fact and ending with value for the client.</li></ol><h3>Step 3</h3><p>Look for stories that tie in multiple types of proofs. This may include a case study profiling a 3rd party that recognizes the value driven from a process derived from a unique bit of your intellectual property. Now that is compelling.</p><h3>Step 4</h3><p>Draw the slides, and then get somebody who has the time and the skills to put them into PowerPoint.</p><h3>Step 5</h3><p>Practice.</p><h3>Step 6</h3><p>Win!</p><p>Simple really &#8211; good luck!</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.killerpresentations.com/sales-effectiveness/prove-it-make-your-sales-arguments-more-compelling-believable/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Research Shows&#8230;and Other Attempts at Credibility</title><link>http://www.killerpresentations.com/sales-effectiveness/research-shows-and-other-attempts-at-credibility/</link> <comments>http://www.killerpresentations.com/sales-effectiveness/research-shows-and-other-attempts-at-credibility/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:33:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator><![CDATA[nick]]></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Sales Effectiveness]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Persuasion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Research]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.killerpresentations.com/?p=1029</guid> <description><![CDATA[<div><img
width="150" height="107" src="http://www.killerpresentations.com/kp/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/research-150x107.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="research" /></div>Have you ever attended a course or read literature that uses the phrase &#8220;research shows?&#8221; I&#8217;m getting skeptical in my old age. &#8220;Research shows that&#8230;&#8221; is used more often than the referral to a higher authority, and usually is an indication of fiction. &#8220;I believe that the most popular colour of lingerie is nude.&#8221; This may be true, but nothing &#8230; <a
href="http://www.killerpresentations.com/sales-effectiveness/research-shows-and-other-attempts-at-credibility/">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img
width="150" height="107" src="http://www.killerpresentations.com/kp/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/research-150x107.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="research" /></div><p>Have you ever attended a course or read literature that uses the phrase &#8220;research shows?&#8221; I&#8217;m getting skeptical in my old age. &#8220;Research shows that&#8230;&#8221; is used more often than the referral to a higher authority, and usually is an indication of fiction.</p><p><strong>&#8220;I believe that the most popular colour of lingerie is nude.&#8221;</strong> This may be true, but nothing in this statement says that it is true – belief is entirely dependant on the reader&#8217;s assessment of my integrity (dangerous at best).</p><p><strong>&#8220;Research shows that the most popular colour of lingerie is nude.&#8221;</strong> This reads like it isn&#8217;t my opinion and because the word research is mentioned, it must be true. However, there is still no validation of the truth.<br
/> <span
id="more-1029"></span><br
/> Add some detail, and the statement, standing on it&#8217;s own, is more believable. <strong>&#8220;Research conducted in India this year by Debenhams, a leading retailer, shows that according to POS data, the most popular colour of lingerie is nude.&#8221;</strong></p><p>Add a reference, and the statement becomes more credible. Here&#8217;s mine: <a
href="http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-11/man-woman/28263631_1_bra-colour-personality">Times India Dec 2010</a></p><p>When I am writing sales presentations for clients we need to make the proof statements believable so we try and provide as much detail behind the proof points (most often case studies) as possible. Data is king; and quantifiable data is extremely persuasive. If I add the fact that 72% of shoppers choose for nude lingerie and sales are up 38%,  there is now trending, relevant data that my audience can act on – whether that&#8217;s stocking more nude lingerie or changing a marketing scheme.</p><p>So when you hear somebody say &#8220;research shows,&#8221; ask the following questions:</p><ul><li>What research?</li><li>When?</li><li>Who executed the research?</li><li>Can you show me the data?</li></ul><p>Otherwise, assume it is made it up to strengthen a weak argument.</p><p>By the way, the alternative is to just state it as a fact: &#8220;&#8216;Nude lingerie is the most popular, the question you should be asking is <strong>Why?</strong>&#8220;</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.killerpresentations.com/sales-effectiveness/research-shows-and-other-attempts-at-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>